Tuesday 30 January 2018

Steal The Style - Idea Development and New Ideas

New Ideas:

Finding an outfit via Tumblr and trying to recreate it on a budget

I thought an idea for a possible segment for the show would be a challenge of finding an outfit on a website like Tumblr or Instagram and trying to recreate a similar outfit on a budget. This could be £25-30 and the idea would be the two presenters going to cheaper stores to create this outfit on s budget.




It would be a simple idea to fulfil as it would minimal research and the presenters would not need to do anything crazy for it to work.

£25 Challenge

This challenge would consist of the two presenters having a budget of £25 and then going out to local charity shops and buy an outfit with their budget. This challenge has been inspired by research I did into YouTube videos. Charity shop hauls seem popular and we could create something similar in the live production VT's.




Once the outfit has been bought in the VT, it could be modelled by the two presenters in front of the live studio audience and they could decide with double-sided cards to which outfit is better.

Research to Do:


These are the notes from our production meeting. We will be asked to research a specific section in groups for the next meeting in the next few weeks. Unfortunately, a few other groups had a similar idea to my charity shop idea so I did not get mention mine. However, I am happy that something similar looks like it will be incorporated into the show! 




Trends of the week/ Steals of the Season
  • Presenter lead, look at 5 styles that are current ( spring/ summer looks)
  • Show a variety of ways to style the item
  • VT- a reporter in the high street, finding the trends for the best price OR
  • VT- both presenters, finding looks for each other, look revealed in the studio
  • Research: find average budget for a clothes shop, look for statistics we can use
Old to New
  • Look at TV shows that are set in the past ( Peaky Blinders, Stranger things) and look at the fashion they bring with them
  • How to emulate that style on a budget
Old to New [VT]
  • Fashion History: Churchill- siren suits- evolved into onesies/ rompers
  • Look at how practical clothes have evolved into fashion
  • Chartwell- Churchills house, in Kent
Fashion Fails
  • Embarrassing wardrobe malfunctions
  • fails/ triumphs of online shopping
  • Bad fashion choices from the past/ school years
  • Audience participation- they bring in own stories
DIY fashion
  • Look at big brands, how to emulate look
  • Tutorial segment shows audience how to make this product
  • Fun and quick projects you can do at home
  • http://www.stylemotivation.com/24-stylish-diy-clothing-tutorials/
Independent Shops [VT]
  • Presenters need a challenge, or a budget, to find the best item in the time
  • Owner interview- why shop independent?
  • Shop must have an interesting backstory/ niche
  • Etsy shops- only sell online
Music
  • An independent/ local artist
  • How they present themselves on stage vs off stage
  • Two fans of different types of music do a style swap





Live Presentation Lecture - Production Design

Staging Your Production

  • Just as a stage production will need a set and props, so will the studio production.
  • Transforming it from a grey shell into whatever world we are creating
  • There are a number of external people that we will be working with.
Sets/Props/Costumes
  • Often freelancers
  • Production team will work alongside them
  • Companies pitch ideas to be commissioned
Collaborative Working
  • How do you work with them?
  • What can they offer?
  • Getting the best out of them
  • Briefings
Who are they?
  • Set designers
  • Costume designers
  • Prop designers
  • Music (Andrew)
  • Graphics (Simon)
  • Promos (Promo Team)
Choosing Your Creatives
  • Find someone with the right expertise
  • Bring a clear idea of what you want out of them
  • Spend time making sure the style is the same throughout
  • Timescale/budget/genre/content/number of contributors/size of production
Commisioning Them
  • Our promos team and UCA Rochester, design for theatre, film and performance
  • Get inspo from existing work and what is on TV
  • For music, make sure there is no problem with copyright
Working Relationship
  • Set clear deadlines from the outset
  • Monitor the progress of the work
  • Communication is essential
  • Managing work schedule
  • Allow people their own creative freedom
Audience and The Set
  • Staging and camera positions are important to know well in advance
  • Practicalities on set
  • Look at examples to give you a sense of what is possible
HD vs 2D
  • HD makes it more important that the set is done well as you can see every little detail 
Lighting 
  • Directors will need to create a lighting plan
  • More than functional, consider gels, mood enhancing etc
  • Fully certified electricians will rig the lights - They need a lot of INFO
  • Make sure lighting is dictated by decision
  • Must be worked out in rehearsals
Rehearsals
  • Important that the project is: sustainable, fits duration, work on studio camera, be well lit
  • In order to know it goes to plan, rehearsals are key.
Schedules and Deadlines
  • Must be managed well by the production team
Paperwork
  • Schedules
  • Call sheets
  • Contact Lists
  • Risk Assessments
  • Camera Cards
  • Shot Lists
  • Scrips
  • Running Order
  • Floor and Seating Plans
Production Style 
  • Must make sure that all the elements match the "Style Bible". Will make us look unified
  • Branding is always Key
Visual Style and Programme Tone
  • Research into current shows that we may want to mimic
  • Needs to be consistent throughout the whole programme 
  • Agree on this style early on with Producer and Director

Live Presentation Lecture - Content & Contributors, Locations and Branding

  1. Content
  2. Contribution
  3. Location
  4. Branding

Research Finding People:Presenters/Actors
Contributors
Audience
Artists/Guests

Casting Talent
  • These are our performers
  • They may be paid or not, will have some sort of contract
  • Relevant skills/Experience
  • Performace
  • Charisma
  • Look/Appropriate brand/style 
  • Representation and relevance to audience
UCA -  Relevant trade organisations, Trade/Press People, Style/Fashion Mags

Finding Talent
  • Auditions - Advertisements calling for new talents / Looking Through showreels
  • Agents - People normally have agents, may be an "expert" in a field, need to negotiate Money and a contract
  • Scouting - Visiting talent and seeing them in person, see how they really perform
  • Talent websites and Journals - Spotlight, Mandy etc
Issues
  • Scouting - Look for new talent anywhere
  • This can be a problem because it can be time-consuming
  • Background research needs to be done - Get to know if they will perform
  • Could be open - find new unfound talent
  • Preferably closed and sifted through already 
  • Get a showreel of anyone you wish to cast so you have an idea first.
Dealing with Agents
  • Check availability - Find out what else they are working on - Potential scheduling clashes ETC
  • Hours/Days Contracts
  • The rate of Pay?
  • Expenses - BEWARE of rates. Miles/Food costs/ Train tickets
  • Consider setting flat fee or limits
Artists Contracts and Release Forms
  • Essential that all talent are given contracts or release forms
  • Get people to commit to paper
  • This should be done well in advance so we guarantee their commitment 
  • Liaise with Production Manager 
Finding Contributors
  • You need to apply many techniques to research contributors
  • Appeals/Ads/Sourcing Contacts/Contacts/press Offices/Media Liason
Finding Audience
  • Need to decide what purpose your audience's purpose is...
  • Passive
  • Active
  • Representative
  • Sensitive
  • Audience Size: Below 100
  • Can use various websites to "sell" tickets through
Representation - Audience
  • Audience in studio should reflect the audience at home
  • Many programmes are individually cast
  • Need to think about audience carefully
Accuracy
  • Keep good records of the pre-production process in an available for all Document
  • Keep info accurate and checked - Spellings/Content/Key Info
Remember OFCOM Broadcasting Code!

Scheduling & Organising Talent - Careful Negotiations, Keep the contacts on hand as they may be needed for post-production like voiceover.

Production Meeting 2 ( 30-01-18)

Production Meeting 2 ( 30-01-18)
Show Content Ideas
Trends of the week/ Steals of the Season
  • Presenter lead, look at 5 styles that are current ( spring/ summer looks)
  • Show a variety of ways to style the item
  • VT- a reporter in the high street, finding the trends for the best price OR
  • VT- both presenters, finding looks for each other, look revealed in the studio
  • Research: find average budget for a clothes shop, look for statistics we can use
Plus Size
  • Style makeover, on a budget
  • Will not do, will use plus size models in modelling sections
Old to New
  • Look at TV shows that are set in the past ( Peaky Blinders, Stranger things) and look at the fashion they bring with them
  • How to emulate that style on a budget
Old to New [VT]
  • Fashion History: Churchill- siren suits- evolved into onesies/ rompers
  • Look at how practical clothes have evolved into fashion
  • Chartwell- Churchill’s house, in kent
Fashion Fails
  • Embarrassing wardrobe malfunctions
  • fails/ triumphs of online shopping
  • Bad fashion choices from the past/ school years
  • Audience participation- they bring in own stories
Wardrobe Dig
  • Find interesting character
  • Figure out whose wardrobe it is
  • Needs to be a celebrity to work
DIY fashion
  • Look at big brands, how to emulate look
  • Tutorial segment, shows audience how to make this product
  • Fun and quick projects you can do at home
  • http://www.stylemotivation.com/24-stylish-diy-clothing-tutorials/
Independent Shops [VT]
  • Presenters need a challenge, or a budget, to find the best item in the time
  • Owner interview- why shop independent?
  • Shop must have an interesting backstory/ niche
  • Etsy shops- only sell online
Music
  • An independent/ local artist
  • How they present themselves on stage vs off stage
  • Two fans of different types of music do a style swap

To Do:  try and expand on research into these segments, see the research to be done doc

Monday 29 January 2018

Steal The Style - First Research into The Genre & Production Style

Research Into Fashion Videos on YouTube

It was important to do some research on videos with a style similar to the one of our live show. YouTube is probably the best place to start research as it has a market of a lot of people making videos with a similar budget to the one we will be working with on this project.

I wanted to look into people who made consistent fashion videos on YouTube and see if they followed a certain style or theme throughout their videos.

After doing a bit of research into Fashion YouTubers, I came up with a case study. I found a channel by Ingrid Nilsen. She has 3.8 Million Subscribers and averages 1.4 Million views per month. Her channel is focused on Fashion and Beauty but does merge into other genres with more chatty videos. (Ingrid Nilsen YouTube Channel, 2018)


I noticed that her channel art is minimalist, it is right to the point and does not have any more than needed. I think this works well, as the Channel name is her name I don't think you really need any more. While I assume Simon will adapt what Melissa and Katie have previously done, I think that the logo they have created already works well with the theme of most fashion bloggers. It is minimalist but with subtle accents to make it a unique brand. From my research into similar videos so far, it seems that a logo/theme that is to the point is more important than a flashy logo with multiple dimensions to it.


As for Ingrid Nilsen's videos, they follow a similar theme to her branding. The videos themselves are edited in a minimalist way but with editing makes it interesting for the viewer. For example, the quadruple screen part where she shows all the outfits that will be included in the video. This is a way of letting the viewer know "whats to come" in this certain video. The videos also generally include a backing track which is upbeat to keep with the light-hearted theme of the video.


As for the main portion of the video, it followed a similar theme for each outfit. 
It would start out with a piece to camera talking about the item and then merge into a shot of the outfit and the costs. This once again was done in a minimalist way. Apart from Ingrid in the shot, there is only ever the text with the prices. This may seem like it "has little production quality" to some, however, I think this works well in videos like this as we do not need any more information than this, so why show it? Once the price info is on screen, it cuts to a few detail shots of the clothes so the viewer can see in higher detail the quality and "feel" of the products.


There also has been thought into the cinematography in this piece. For the main PTC, it has a nice simplistic background with a "cosy" and "personal" feel to it. I think it is designed to make the viewer connect with Ingrid as much as possible. Looking through multiple different videos of hers, she always has a relaxed personality and one that will keep her regular videos at ease because you know what to expect. 


The lighting and cinematography work well on her outside shots. There is evident planning into where it will be shot as the lighting is good and the background is white so the price infographics would work well in opposition to the backdrop. As I will be operating the camera on one set of the VT's it will be important to look at locations beforehand, so I will be able to plan what equipment will be needed. Example: If were we are planning to shoot in a place that could be light/dark depending on weather (eg. Looking through the wardrobe of a blogger segment [4]) I would need to plan to bring adequate lighting. 

Even outside her videos, Ingrid follows her "theme" into her Thumbnails and social media. While each thumbnail seems to have a different colour, it has a similar pattern of around 1/3 of the screen covered by a colour triangle which includes relevant text to the video.



While I will not be apart of the branding in any way, I think it is important to realise that a lot of Fashion YouTubers follow a theme over all platforms. This will mean that we will have to all work together closely to make sure that the theme and style are consistent throughout all social media and our final piece. 

Through this research into Ingrid Nilsen, I think the biggest thing that I realised that it will be very important to follow a particular "style" throughout the whole show. This means that the whole show including VT's will need to be directed and produced in a way that all "parts" will work in harmony. I don't think this will be much of an issue, however, as we have producers who really know the genre and will have a great idea of how they want the show to run including the theme. 

I also noted that a lot of Ingrid's videos have a similar colour pallet, I'm sure more research will be done into this but if we follow a similar colour pallet it may help with the continuity. 


Looking into TV Shows & Role Requirements

I had worked as a camera operator on all of the units in some way so far at university, but I wanted to look specifically into camera operations for the Fashion/Beauty genre.



I found a piece that was on ITV's This Morning show. (ITV This Morning Fashion Segment, 2018 ) Strangely this followed a lot of the concepts that I found in Ingrid Nilsen's posts. They had the pop-up with the details and also wide angle shots mixed with close-ups of the items. I think this has shown, no matter the budget, that we should always aim to get as many different types of shots for the same product.




As for the camerawork itself, it wasn't that complicated. It was mostly a static camera with the model walking into shot and creating movement in the shot in that way. of course not all the segments would be like this, however, it was interesting to note that in both of the scenarios that I have seen so far the camera is static. We could also make the shot interesting by using some pull focus shots and we could experiment with slight movement before the shot focuses on the main subject.

Ideas for VT Segments

I don't really have any experience in this genre, but I have come up with a few ideas that could possibly work with this project.
  • Something popular on YouTube is "challenge" type videos that I think could work well in this show, however, I am not sure what segment it would work well in.
    However, the general idea was giving the two presenters a budget (eg. £25) to go out and find some unique items, maybe a full outfit? This would be a way to mix some of the ideals that are popular into a VT in the show. I do not know what segment this would work well in, however, it could work in the "Very vintage" segment if it was changed to going to a market or charity shop to find cheap items for an outfit.
  • For the "Not on the high street" segment, we could have something with the presenters finding unique outfits from online blogs and then sourcing something similar & buying them. Then explaining why they may interest the viewer. It would be a way of showing people how to style clothes that they have taken inspiration from online sources. 

Sources

Ingrid Nilsen YouTube Channel, 2018
Accessed on 29th January 2018

ITV This Morning Fashion Segment, 2018 
Accessed on 29th January 2018


Friday 26 January 2018

Steal The Style - Job Assignments and First Brief.

I was really excited to start work on this unit but first, we had to be interviewed for our jobs. I applied for VT & Studio camera as well as Production Manager, however, I was only really interested in being a camera operator. 

My interview went well, after showing Jo and Helen the work that I recently filmed in Germany, they were really impressed with the project that I completed alongside university. My main passion is for camera work even though I had really enjoyed being the director and producer of my most recent two University Projects, I wanted to focus more Camerawork for this unit, hence why I did not apply for the directors and producers roles.

Thankfully, I did get my first option which was a nice result for me personally as I was unsure really what I would have done if I did not get the camera position as others had had more interest in the other roles. I said to Helen and Jo that I was really excited to work on a project that wasn't based on cars and sports. (which my last 2/3 units have been based on)


After the roles were decided, we had a presentation from Katie and Melissa, basically explaining what the idea was and what they thought they needed extra help on.

My notes from this meeting were as followed.
  • Researching our own elements and how they are relevant to our role 
  • Look at similar shows
  • Reason behind story choices 
  • Background history. Context of story
  • Give people options 
  • Research into the Channel: E4 - what do they do, how do they do it. 
  • YouTube fashion videos. Magazines. Company magazine. Vogue format
Over the weekend I am going to do my research into fashion videos on YouTube and also look into similar TV shows that are on right now. I will also do some research into my specific role and what planning I would need to do for this project.

After this meeting, we split into our "groups" We grouped together in a "VT Group" but we also did have a smaller group of people who we are working with on 2 VT's each.

Our Mini group for VT's [VT Team B] was as followed:
  • Conor Deamer as VT Producer
  • George Wing as VT Director
  • Myself as VT Camera Operator
  • Alex Hargood as Sound Operations (and VT Editor)
  • George Nicholls as VT Team B Researcher
When we get a better idea of the project and exactly what our VT's will be, we can work more closely on our specific roles. Over the weekend I will be working on possible ideas for the VT's as well. Katie and Melissa said they had their own ideas for these VT's but that if we had our own ideas we should always pitch the ideas to them.


Production Meeting 1 (26.01.18)

Production Meeting 1 (26.01.18)

  • The show- ‘Steal the Style’- a chat/ advice show, looking at being an antidote to the mainstream fashion.
  • Should cater to all budgets.
  • Should look at all aspects of fashion
  • 4 different topics with a VT each, some examples-
    • 1-Trends of the week: popular trends dressed differently. VT- trends for the best price
    • 2- not on the high street: a guest segment, the owner of an independent shop. Interview format
    • 3- vintage markets: VT make an outfit from a vintage market/ top five items found
    • 4- wardrobe dig: a guest ( casting possibility: blogger with quirky taste) shows us their favourite items

  • Graphics: similar style to the example, font tone colour- to keep
  • channel : E4/ C4 similar style shows how to look good naked etc.
  • Target audience: male and female, 16+, working age
  • Presenters:  one male, one female, one fashion expert, one bubbly personality ( eg. Gok Wan and Georgia Toffolo)
  • TO DO:

  • research fashion and style- look at magazines for research
  • research into own roles
  • Brainstorm ideas

Wednesday 24 January 2018

First World Problems PITCH Reflection

I wanted to reflect on the pitch and evaluate how it went and take on board the feedback that was given.

Starting off I assume everyone was in the same boat, everyone was probably nervous in some way and the same was the case for myself and Cailan. It was fewer nerves about presenting as I felt confident in my abilities to communicate the message of the presentation. It was more worries about possible questions and if we did actually have an answer to them.

I think the presentation went okay... I was happy with how I presented the powerpoint but no doubt I probably did make mistakes. I noticed Cailan talked very fast at certain points so it possibly meant the message may have been lost in that moment, but nerves were playing a factor for both of us. We got through the majority of the slides with little issues, but the timing of changing slides etc could have been better as at some points we were ahead or behind what was actually being said.

We did get a hurry up with a few minutes to go and Cailan did end up started stumbling a more. I don't think that this affected us really, but the nerves had gone into overload at that point. We got through all of our slides in the 10-minute slot and we then had to worry about questions.

I wasn't too disappointed with the questions and feedback. Del criticised the enthusiasm of the project, thinking that if we had come up with this idea and gotten it to this stage that we should have been more enthused about it. All I can think is that the nerves had gotten in the way of me pitching the project in a better way. I wasn't that disappointed with my pitching performance, but I did wish that I spent a bit of time learning the slides and what was on them so I would have to rely less on the cue cards that I was holding.

It seemed as if this idea was very plausible and one that could have been put into practice if it was chosen. However, I feel that the idea itself may have been too dry and not exciting enough. If we had chosen a more interesting "First world problem" than it may have been a better idea and pitch.

Even though we had gone to the lengths of finding a presenter and getting him to record a video it seems that may have actually been negative in our pitch. Some did not like that Andrew was not enthusiastic enough. This was odd because he was pretty enthusiastic about his piece to camera and an interesting enough video to show the type of presenter that we wanted. We had also cast 12 people as possible presenters which they did seem to like.

Of course, it would have been nice to have been the producer but in reality, our idea was not good enough and our pitch could have probably gone better. If we had chosen a more interesting first world problem then maybe our pitch had been better received, but I still feel the idea as a concept was not good enough. I would have liked to have worked harder on our pitch but I found it hard to get everything I wanted to be communicated with our team. In hindsight, it would be nicer to work for a few more days on this project. before pitching so both sides of the party could have contributed more.

I am looking forward to now working on Katie and Mellisa's project! It will be really nice to work on something in a different genre and broaden my experience. I hope to be working with cameras in some way as I think that is probably my best skill.

Monday 22 January 2018

First World Problems Live Show - Presentation Preparations

Today we started our final preparation for our presentation. We have now finished the presentation itself and are excited to be able to present it on Tuesday 23rd January.

We now have a logical running order of our presentation which is as followed.

  1. Title Slide (Presented by Alex)
  2. The concept (Presented by Cailan)
  3. Show overview (Presented by Alex)
  4.  Target Audience and Tech specs (Presented by Alex)
  5. The plausibility (Presented by Cailan)
  6. Possible presenters (Presented by Alex)
  7. Studio Layout (Presented by Cailan)
  8. Audience Type (Presented by Cailan)
  9. Whats in the show Part 1 (Presented by Alex)
  10. Intermission
  11. Whats in the show part 2 (Presented by Cailan)
  12. Whats in the show part 2 CONT (Presented by Cailan)
  13. Possible VT Routes (Presented by Alex)
  14. Possible questions for Quiz round (Presented by Cailan)
  15. Potential show timings (Presented by Alex)
  16. Questions (Presented by Alex)
It is hard to get all the information that we wanted in a 10-minute presentation but we did a great job at making the points clear and in an order that would be easy to follow.

Work on the presentation
Slide 2: The concept

On this slide, I did work into the "type" of show that we are making. It was important to research the genre and also know how many presenters we would have. I personally thought we should have 3 presenters as it is easier to have a natural conversation than only having 2 presenters. Through doing further research and looking at shows like Top Gear and The Grand Tour, we decided 3 presenters would be our decision.

Slide 3: Show overview

I did research into the target audience, which I will talk about later. I also thought of the tagline for our production of "Studio Production with 3 presenters on a stage (panel-based), which has a changing theme based on First World Problems each week." This clearly describes what we are going for, and I feel the tagline will help sell our show.
Slide 4: Target Audience & Tech Specs

I did all of the research into the target audience and tech specs. I had originally thought we would "sell" this show as a Show for "DAVE" but after a meeting with Helen, she said that Channel 4 would be more appropriate. 

As you can see from the graph, 16-34 years of age was a good proportion of viewership for Channel 4 and they also have an audience dedicated to their channel, which is only true of other big channels, BBC1 & BBC2.

Once we had decided that Channel 4 was the channel that we wanted to pitch to, I wanted to get to know about the "tech specs" for the channel. This is important to know because it shows you have done your research into the brand you are pitching to.
Here are a few examples of some of the Tech Specs that we would be expected to follow.
  1. 25fps at 1080i (50 Field Interlaced) 16:9 Aspect Ratio
  2. Various codecs can be used to render, as long as it is at 160 MB/s or above
  3. Shot and Rendered in an interlaced format
  4. Quality Control: Picture must be well lit and sharp and have no excessive noise
  5. Our programme would work in a 40 minute TV slot with one advert. This would be with a total maximum delivery time of 30 Minutes and 30 Seconds which works with our broadcast. This includes 25 seconds of credits
These are not all of the Tech Specs but they are some of the key ones that I thought would be important to mention in our pitch.

Slide 5:

I did the work into the plausibility. I wanted to mention in the presentation that we had thought about the plausibility of all scenarios for our project. Here is the plausibility of all scenarios.

For the commuting challenge VT we’ll require the following;
  • 1x Car (Supplied by the presenter or can be hired from Maidstone at £25/day.)
  • 1x Bicycle (Supplied by the presenter or one of the crew members.)
  • Permission to film on public transport i.e. Trains. (Contact South-Eastern Rail to confirm.)
  • 3x Camera Crews (of 3 people each), 1 Camera Operator, 1 Sound Operator and 1 Production Assistant. 
  • Each camera crew would have 1 Panasonic DVX200, as well as 2 Go-Pro’s

Public opinion VT and the quiz round VT will require the following;
  • 1x Lead Presenter.
  • 2x Teams of 4 (Comprised of 2 camera operators, 1 sound operator and 1 production assistant).
  • Public filming access.
Studio
  • Set designed with FWP Theme
  • Access for a Car & Props (We have checked and there is space to do this)
  • Camera positions that do not interfere with the audience 
We could not be expected to go anymore in depth into possibilities at this stage. We only had limited time to think of all of the scenarios, but we are happy that we found answers to so many questions at this stage.

Slide 6:

I did all of the work into the possible presenters. I had already thought about having Andrew Phipps, who we had previously worked. He is a great presenter and a perfect character for our show and if our project was to be commissioned, we would love to have him as a presenter, and probably our main presenter! Here is his audience tape that we asked for, for our presentation to show that Andrew would be a perfect character for our show. 


I had also looked at over 100 actors on Handy Actors and whittled it down to 12 presenters, a mixture of male and female presenters. I am open to having a mixed cast of male and female but I want the decision to be based on how they interact with each other to make a natural piece.  I have saved all of the 12 actors links so we can make further contact if we are commissioned.

Slide 7:

I had made the initial studio layout but Cailan did a good job at adapting it to the actual studio layout and making it all fit. This layout has been adapted to thoughts from Helen that the audience needs to be closer to the stage and also noting that the stage and audience would be on a level.



Slide 9 to 12:

We wanted to show more in depth what would be in the first episode of our live show. I set out the plan while Cailan tidied up my wording.

Here is our plan for this first programme. Timings for each segment are later.
  • Roll open credits and presenters introduce themselves to camera and audience, followed by an audience vote around the weeks topic.
  • Every show will begin with an audience vote, based on a like/dislike question made by the lead presenter. 
  • - This will be in the form of a Green/Red card corresponding to Yes/No respectively.
  • This will link to a VT which shows one of the presenters, asking the public for their thoughts on the week’s topic. (e.g. Commuting)
  • Segways into a much broader news segment where panellists introduce a guest and discuss relevant issues at the time.Roll Main VT (VT02) - Commuting Challenge | Car Vs Train (Vs Bus?) - Approx 4 mins in length
  • Mini Panel themed quiz (ie. Commuting) show with the main presenter hosting the show while the other two presenters work on seperate teams. One team will have the guest from the news segment and one team will have an audience guest (One hired by us)
  • This quiz will involve presenters and the guest answering a series of ‘First World Problem’ related questions.
  • Part 1 of the quiz will see the teams attempt to remember as many facts from the VT as possible. 
  • Part 2 of the quiz will see the teams go head to head in a ‘buzzer round’ through presenter lead questions.The team with the most points will win a trophy.
  • The quiz show then segways into the Main VT (VT02) , The Commuting Challenge Part 2.
  • Upon the challenge ending, the presenters discuss the results in-studio.
  • Presenters “sign off” and thank the audience for their participation and attendance, thus concluding the show. 
  • Roll Credits.
We are happy with how in depth we went with this plan of the first show. We know that if we did get commissioned that we would most likely have to change some plans to fit around changing logistics. But we are happy that all of our plans are realistic and could be fulfilled by the team.

Slide 13:

I also did all the work on possible routes for our main VT Challenge. 

Three routes I have looked into that could work for our challenge are these:
  1. Paddock Wood to Maidstone (or visa versa) Around 30 Mins by car & train
  2. Meopham to Sittingbourne (or visa versa) Around 30 Mins by car & train
  3. Stonegate to Tonbridge (or visa versa) Around 30 Mins by car & train
These are the routes that I found in the time that we had, but if we did get commissioned I would work together with the team to find more routes and ones that may be more interesting than the ones I know through experience.

Slide 14:

Cailan and I worked on possible questions for the Quiz round.
The questions would have to be related to First world problems and in Part 1 of the quiz, they would be watching a VT which would include hidden answers that the teams need to remember. This needs more work but if we did get commission we would be able to work more on this.

As for part 2 of the quiz segment, we would have set questions asked by the main presenter to the two teams, the fastest answer gets a point.

Some examples of the questions we came up with are:

“What is the average commute time for people in the UK?”

“According to a recent Yahoo survey, what is the biggest commuting ‘bugbear’?”

The teams would be given 4 options for each question, for the second part of the quiz.

Slide 15:

Lastly, I did all the work into potential timings for the show. 
  • 0:00-1:30 Minutes: Roll Title Sequence and Presenter introduction. 
  • 1:30-2:30 Minutes: Audience Vote: Do you like commuting?
  • 2:30-4:30 Minutes: Public VT: Why do you dislike commuting?
  • 4:30-10:00 Minutes: News Panel Segment - What's going on in the world?
  • 10:00-15:00 Minutes: VT - What’s the fastest way to commute Challenge? Part 1 
  • INTERMISSION to change Crews
  • 15:00-24:00 Minutes: Mini quiz show with 2 presenters and 2 guests including 2 Min VT
  • 24:00-28:00 Minutes: VT - What’s the fastest way to commute Challenge? Part 2
  • 28:00-30:00 Minutes: Show concludes and roll credits
These once again will be likely to change and become finer. However, for a first plan, we think we have done a good job at thinking about all possible outcomes before they happen. 


We decided to run through the final presentation to see what the timings were like.

It was 15 minutes on the first run through. 13:30 Minutes on the second run through and 11:20 minutes on our third run through. We are happy with the length of the presentation and think that all of the key points have been included. We are also confident that any questions that come our way will be able to be answered. As we have covered so much we hope that there will not be too many questions!

Here is the recorded run through of our presentation.This is the second run- through. The final run through cut out Cailans "ums" and my mistakes which cut the length significantly. 


Production - Major Project Evaluation

Overall Process The creation of "Dream Chaser" has certainly been the hardest challenge of my life. I took on board the responsi...